Apple Pay at Center of New Trade Secret Lawsuit - MacRumorsOpen MenuShow RoundupsShow Forums menuVisit ForumsOpen Sidebar
Skip to Content

Apple Pay at Center of New Trade Secret Lawsuit

New York-based law firm Kasowitz LLP today announced that it is filing a lawsuit against Apple on behalf of its client, Texas-based company Fintiv, over alleged theft of mobile wallet technology used to create Apple Pay.

apple pay feature dynamic island
In a press release, the law firm said the complaint accuses Apple of violating U.S. federal and state RICO and trade secret laws.

According to the press release, the complaint alleges that Apple approached Fintiv's predecessor CorFire between 2011 and 2012, and received confidential technical information under non-disclosure agreements (NDAs). Fintiv believed that Apple planned to license CorFire's mobile wallet technology, but said it instead stole the confidential information and later hired away key CorFire employees, before launching Apple Pay in 2014.

The lawsuit is being filed in a Northern Georgia district court.

"Apple's theft of Fintiv's technology is part of a pattern and practice that Apple has engaged in for years – falsely pretending to partner with companies in order to steal confidential and proprietary information under the guise of a working relationship, and thereafter hiring away key employees, all in order to steal the company's valuable intellectual property and use it to commercialize the business on its own," the complaint alleges.

The complaint cites Apple's "similar pernicious scheme" to steal trade secrets from Masimo to develop the Apple Watch's blood oxygen measuring feature.

MacRumors has yet to find the complaint in the U.S. court filing system, so these allegations and quotes are entirely relayed from the press release.

While this particular lawsuit in Georgia is new, Fintiv has been waging a legal battle against Apple since 2018, when it filed a patent infringement case against the company in Texas. That case was eventually dismissed, but an appeals court overturned the decision and remanded it to Texas for further proceedings. Earlier this week, a judge in Texas ruled that Apple did not infringe certain patents, and granted Fintiv's motion to dismiss the remaining claims. Now, the saga will shift to a Georgia court with the filing of this fresh lawsuit.

Related Roundup: Apple Pay

Popular Stories

iPhone 18 Pro Deep Red Feature

iPhone 18 Pro Launching Later This Year With These 12 New Features

Wednesday March 18, 2026 7:39 am PDT by
While the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max are not expected to launch for another six months or so, there are already plenty of rumors about the devices. It was initially reported that the iPhone 18 Pro models would have fully under-screen Face ID, with only a front camera visible in the top-left corner of the screen. However, the latest rumors indicate that only one Face ID component...
ios 26 4 yellow

Here Are Apple's Release Notes for iOS 26.4

Wednesday March 18, 2026 11:56 am PDT by
Apple provided developers and public beta testers with the release candidate versions of iOS 26.4 and iPadOS 26.4, which means we're going to see a public launch as soon as next week. The RC versions of the software include Apple's official release notes, giving us final details on what's included in the update. Apple Music - Playlist Playground (beta) generates a playlist from your...
Apple Logo Sketch Feature

Apple Has Now Unveiled Eight New Products This Month

Tuesday March 17, 2026 9:25 am PDT by
Apple has unveiled a whopping eight new products so far this March, including an iPhone 17e, iPad Air models with the M4 chip, MacBook Air models with the M5 chip, MacBook Pro models with M5 Pro and M5 Max chips, the all-new MacBook Neo, an updated Studio Display, a higher-end Studio Display XDR, and now the AirPods Max 2 this week. iPhone 17e features the same overall design as the iPhone...

Top Rated Comments

jz0309 Avatar
8 months ago

While this particular lawsuit in Georgia is new, Fintiv has been waging a legal battle against Apple since 2018, when it filed a patent infringement case against the company in Texas. That case was eventually dismissed, but an appeals court overturned the decision and remanded it to Texas for further proceedings. Earlier this week, a judge in Texas ruled ('https://news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/case-patents-procedure-w-d-tex-12') that Apple did not infringe certain patents, and granted Fintiv's motion to dismiss the remaining claims. Now, the saga will shift to a Georgia court with the filing of this fresh lawsuit.
so, didn't get your way in Texas so trying another locale? Bizarre ...
Score: 15 Votes (Like | Disagree)
MyOwnDrummer Avatar
8 months ago

Apple in hot water again
What’s your basis for this claim? A lawsuit of this nature, possibly from a patent troll, does not rise to “in hot water”. So do you have information to substantiate your claim?
Score: 15 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Dustin Lenzz Avatar
8 months ago
…Apple (Didn’t) Pay…
Score: 11 Votes (Like | Disagree)
spazzcat Avatar
8 months ago
They are also judge shopping.

Not as far as I can tell. The company is nearly 20 years old, and has produced digital wallet systems for a multitude of companies in over 30 countries.

However, their tie-ins with crypto atomically makes them sketchy in my book, so maybe?




While this particular lawsuit in Georgia is new, Fintiv has been waging a legal battle against Apple since 2018, when it filed a patent infringement case against the company in Texas. That case was eventually dismissed, but an appeals court overturned the decision and remanded it to Texas for further proceedings. Earlier this week, a judge in Texas ruled ('https://news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/case-patents-procedure-w-d-tex-12') that Apple did not infringe certain patents, and granted Fintiv's motion to dismiss the remaining claims. Now, the saga will shift to a Georgia court with the filing of this fresh lawsuit.
Score: 9 Votes (Like | Disagree)
MyOwnDrummer Avatar
8 months ago
Is Fintiv a patent troll?
Score: 9 Votes (Like | Disagree)
zarmanto Avatar
8 months ago

And why now?! How long has ApplePay been around. It is like they wait forever before acting.
If I were to speculate, I'd say it's likely because their existing B2B model is drying up and they're running out of money, so all that's left to prevent them from declaring bankruptcy is to litigate against their single most significant past negotiating failure.

I would further speculate that, rather than Apple "stealing" their trade secrets, Apple probably discovered that what they had wasn't anywhere near novel enough to warrant a business transaction -- but somehow, one employee managed to impress Apple during those negotiations, so Apple took that one good employee with them after they walked away from the table. Likewise, Apple was probably very intentional about directing that employee to avoid using anything from their previous employer that might be useful in a lawsuit against Apple... because that's what smart companies do.

Sometimes, the dominant corporation is the villian who steals from their competitors and then walks away while laughly maniacally. Sometimes, they're simply better able to deliver than those competitors.
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Related Apple News: Local News | South Africa | Education | Reviews | Sport