LG Seeking Compensation From Apple Over Canceled MicroLED Apple Watch Project - MacRumorsOpen MenuShow RoundupsShow Forums menuVisit ForumsOpen Sidebar
Skip to Content

LG Seeking Compensation From Apple Over Canceled MicroLED Apple Watch Project

LG is seeking compensation from Apple following the abrupt cancelation of the microLED Apple Watch due to the substantial investments it made in preparation of the project, The Elec reports.

Apple Watch Ultra Black Feature
As a result of the device's cancelation, LG Display has apparently been left with substantial sunk costs, including the expense of purchasing 14 U.S. patents related to microLED technology from Taiwan's Ultra Display. The company now faces potential claims from its equipment partners, some of whom had also invested in the project without formal contracts in place. LG also moved equipment from Gumi in Gyeongsangbuk-do to Paju in Gyeonggi-do, secured space for the microLED backplane process, and recruited specialized personnel to form a task force dedicated to the project. Overall, LG reportedly spent hundreds of billions of won to prepare for the microLED Apple Watch.

Apple's decision to cancel the project was reportedly based on concerns about the economic viability of microLED technology for the Apple Watch. Despite its potential advantages—such as brighter displays, improved color accuracy, and better power efficiency compared to existing OLED technology—Apple determined that the production costs associated with microLED were too high to justify its inclusion in the Apple Watch. There were also significant challenges related to the manufacturing process, which would have made it more difficult to produce the displays in the required quantities.

Popular Stories

Apple Foldable Thumb

Apple's Foldable iPhone Will Have a Samsung-Made OLED Display

Wednesday April 8, 2026 2:54 am PDT by
Apple has agreed to source foldable OLED panels exclusively from Samsung for the next three years, reports The Elec. Apple will not use foldable panels from other display suppliers as part of the agreement, according to the Korea-based outlet. The company is said to have accepted the terms given the lack of viable alternative suppliers. This year, Apple is expected to release a...
iOS 27 on iPhone 17 1

iOS 27 Will Add These New Features to Your iPhone

Saturday May 2, 2026 8:43 am PDT by
Apple is expected to unveil iOS 27 during its WWDC 2026 keynote on June 8, and there are already many rumored features and changes for iPhones. The first developer beta of iOS 27 will likely be available immediately following the keynote, and a public beta typically follows in July. Following beta testing, the software update should be released to all users with a compatible iPhone in...
Apple Event Logo

Apple Just Released a New Accessory

Monday May 4, 2026 8:13 am PDT by
Apple today released a new Pride Edition Sport Loop for the Apple Watch. The band features a rainbow design with 11 colors of woven nylon yarns. The new Pride Edition Sport Loop is available to order now on Apple.com and in the Apple Store app in 40mm, 42mm, and 46mm sizes, and it will be available at Apple Store locations starting later this week. In the U.S., the band costs $49. There...

Top Rated Comments

jlc1978 Avatar
23 months ago
I suspect there will be some sort of agreement since LG wants Apple as a customer and Apple wants LG to be a viable suppler to keep display costs down due to competition.
Score: 29 Votes (Like | Disagree)
asdfjkl; Avatar
23 months ago

some of whom had also invested in the project without formal contracts in place
Well, that sounds like negligence to me. Why would any company go and make enormous investments without some sort of contract in place?
Score: 11 Votes (Like | Disagree)
vertsix Avatar
23 months ago

So, LG invested all of this time and money WITHOUT a signed contract in hand?
Sounds like a poor business decision. Not something Apple should be financially responsible for.
There was an agreement or contract of sorts. This type of investment doesn't just begin without mutual assurance. Additionally, this happens all the time in engineering with R&D.

Source: am an engineer.
Score: 9 Votes (Like | Disagree)
therunningman Avatar
23 months ago
My guess is that no supplier/manufacturer will ever go into a verbal agreement with Apple in the future. But when plunking down that much capital, LG should have had something signed in advance.
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)
HobeSoundDarryl Avatar
23 months ago
Here we go with a bunch of "no contract: tough loss LG" in favor of Apple Inc. LG probably has 500 contracts with Apple for all kinds of other stuff. There was likely some perception of this moving forward driven by Apple and they were just taking care of a good customer by going a bit out on a limb on this one... with full expectation that that customer wouldn't leave them holding the bag.

Hopefully Apple does the right thing by one of their very important vendors in who knows how many ways. Else, vendor learns an expensive lesson here- makes sure other vendors knows that this client is capable of skipping out on an expensive bill- and then ALL of them demand formal agreements in writing forever after... somewhat complicating Apples execution and even more so many efforts towards secrecy.

"We" always take the Apple side in all things/matters/situations and there's always 2 sides to every story.
Score: 7 Votes (Like | Disagree)
23 months ago

Well, that sounds like negligence to me. Why would any company go and make enormous investments without some sort of contract in place?
I've been involved in negotiations with Apple before. They have a long, like, really really long, lead time. Often, they want to see progress and products before committing much.

I'm not taking sides here, I do understand how this happened, being on that side of the table.
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Related Apple News: Opinion | News | Politics | Education | Sport