Apple Ordered to Pay $625 Million in VirnetX Patent Dispute

Apple was today found guilty of willfully infringing on four patents in an ongoing dispute with VirnetX and has been ordered to pay $625 million in damages, reports CNBC.

The patents in question relate to virtual private networking (VPN) protocols and in today's ruling, the jury decided that Apple's FaceTime and iMessages service, along with the iOS devices that support those services, infringe on VirnetX's intellectual property.

virnetx
The patent dispute between Apple and VirnetX dates back to 2010, with a jury initially awarding VirnetX $368 million in 2012 after Apple was found guilty of infringing on VirnetX patents. That decision was thrown out in September of 2014 after the damages were found to have been incorrectly calculated, but a damages retrial that started last week led to the decision handed down this afternoon.

VirnetX originally requested $532 million in damages, an amount that grew to $625 million taking into account the willful infringement ruling.

Ahead of the jury's decision, CNBC says Apple filed a request asking U.S District Judge Robert Schroeder to declare a mistrial, accusing VirnetX of misleading and confusing the jury during its closing arguments. Schroeder has not yet made a ruling on the request.

Tag: VirnetX

Top Rated Comments

crisss1205 Avatar
131 months ago
apple do the same thing over patents, now everyone is gunning for them!
Well to be fair, Apple actually makes products that use those patents. As far as I know, VirnetX does not make a single product and is essentially a patent troll.
Score: 51 Votes (Like | Disagree)
farewelwilliams Avatar
131 months ago
Judge Robert Schroeder was a partner at Patton Tidwell Schroeder & Culbertson LLP (now renamed to Patton Tidwell & Culbertson) that reperesents...guess what? you got it: patent-holding companies, a.k.a patent trolls.
Score: 37 Votes (Like | Disagree)
rdlink Avatar
131 months ago
Good. Apple has too much money, anyway.
There you are! I was wondering where the absolute final arbiter of who has too much money and who doesn't have enough was. Thanks for coming forward.
Score: 23 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Bubba Satori Avatar
131 months ago
Good. Apple has too much money, anyway.
Why?
How much money should they have?
Score: 13 Votes (Like | Disagree)
rdlink Avatar
131 months ago
Pet Peeve: Can we please stop saying that someone is "guilty" of something in a civil suit? Guilty is a term that is used in criminal proceedings.

Civil litigants are held liable for damages to the complainant.
[doublepost=1454542370][/doublepost]
Why?
Because it's not his.
Score: 13 Votes (Like | Disagree)
LovingTeddy Avatar
131 months ago
Ha-ha... It is nice to see Apple eat their own ****... Suing everyone's ass off and now Apple get sued. Hopefully more company sue Apple and Apple will learn the lesson.
Score: 12 Votes (Like | Disagree)