Apple Sued by West Virginia for Allegedly Allowing CSAM Distribution Through iCloud - MacRumorsOpen MenuShow RoundupsShow Forums menuVisit ForumsOpen Sidebar
Skip to Content

Apple Sued by West Virginia for Allegedly Allowing CSAM Distribution Through iCloud

West Virginia's Attorney General JB McCuskey today announced a lawsuit against Apple, accusing the company of knowingly allowing iCloud to be used to distribute and store child sexual abuse material (CSAM). McCuskey says that Apple has opted to "do nothing about it" for years.

iCloud General Feature Redux

"Preserving the privacy of child predators is absolutely inexcusable. And more importantly, it violates West Virginia law. Since Apple has so far refused to police themselves and do the morally right thing, I am filing this lawsuit to demand Apple follow the law, report these images, and stop re-victimizing children by allowing these images to be stored and shared," Attorney General JB McCuskey said.

According to the lawsuit [PDF], Apple has described itself as the "greatest platform for distributing child porn" internally, but it submits far fewer reports about CSAM than peers like Google and Meta.

Back in 2021, Apple announced new child safety features, including a system that would detect known CSAM in images stored in iCloud Photos. After backlash from customers, digital rights groups, child safety advocates, and security researchers, Apple decided to abandon its plans for CSAM detection in ‌iCloud Photos‌.

"Children can be protected without companies combing through personal data, and we will continue working with governments, child advocates, and other companies to help protect young people, preserve their right to privacy, and make the internet a safer place for children and for us all," Apple said when announcing that it would not implement the feature.

Apple later explained that creating a tool for scanning private ‌iCloud‌ data would "create new threat vectors for data thieves to find and exploit."

West Virginia's Attorney General says that Apple has shirked its responsibility to protect children under the guise of user privacy, and that Apple's decision not to deploy detection technology is a choice, not passive oversight. The lawsuit suggests that since Apple has end-to-end control over hardware, software, and cloud infrastructure, it is not able to claim to be an "unknowing, passive conduit of CSAM."

The lawsuit is seeking punitive damages and injunctive relief requiring Apple to implement effective CSAM detection measures.

Apple was also sued in 2024 over its decision to abandon CSAM detection. A lawsuit representing a potential group of 2,680 victims said that Apple's failure to implement CSAM monitoring tools has caused ongoing harm to victims. That lawsuit is seeking $1.2 billion.

Note: Due to the political or social nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Political News forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.

Popular Stories

Apple Logo 16x9 US Flag Feature

Apple Subpoenas Samsung in South Korea Over DOJ Antitrust Case

Thursday April 9, 2026 4:20 am PDT by
Apple has asked a U.S. court to formally request internal Samsung documents from South Korea as part of discovery in the DOJ's ongoing antitrust lawsuit against the company. The DOJ filed suit against Apple in March 2024, alongside a number of governments, alleging the company used App Store rules, developer restrictions, and control over key iPhone features to stifle competition. After Apple...
Jon Prosser Rainbow

Jon Prosser Still Not Fully Cooperating in Apple's iOS 26 Trade Secrets Lawsuit

Tuesday April 14, 2026 6:57 am PDT by
A joint status report filed yesterday in Apple's trade secrets lawsuit against YouTuber Jon Prosser and Michael Ramacciotti shows Prosser is still failing to comply with discovery, prompting Apple to seek a court order to compel him. The latest filing, submitted to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California yesterday, covers developments since the parties' last update in ...
app store blue banner epic 1

Epic Games Wins Reversal of Stay in App Store Fee Legal Battle

Wednesday April 29, 2026 5:05 am PDT by
Apple will not be able to delay a district court battle over fee calculations while it waits to hear whether the U.S. Supreme Court will weigh in on the latest developments in its long-running dispute with Epic Games. On Tuesday, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed an earlier decision letting Apple keep its current zero-fee link-out commission structure in place while it appeals to...

Top Rated Comments

11 weeks ago
Federal law ('https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title18-section2258A&num=0&edition=prelim') is crystal clear on this matter. In particular, in the section reporting requirements of providers, paragraph F states:


(f) Protection of Privacy.-Nothing in this section shall be construed to require a provider to-
(1) monitor any user, subscriber, or customer of that provider;
(2) monitor the content of any communication of any person described in paragraph (1); or
(3) affirmatively search, screen, or scan for facts or circumstances described in sections (a) and (b).
WV has nothing to stand on, and the AG knows it.
Score: 62 Votes (Like | Disagree)
mikebenton Avatar
11 weeks ago
I no way do I support anyone having or distributing CSAM. I'm just trying to understand the logic here. Are they suing car manufacturers when someone who uses a car to commit a crime? Are they trying to force a scenario where the government and/or vendor gets to sift through all your data and decide if a crime has been committed?
Score: 55 Votes (Like | Disagree)
11 weeks ago
Sued if you do, sued if you don't.
Score: 49 Votes (Like | Disagree)
11 weeks ago
McKuskey is apparently a member of the Federalist Society, who have been pushing things like requiring ID to be online and other limits on internet activity meant to curtail anything they don't like. They want to put parents first, though that is code for making sure that kids aren't exposed to anything outside of their constricted worldview that's pushing the US to be a Christian nation ruled by white people instead of a nation of multiple cultures and religions that's enshrined in the Constitution.

When something like this comes out of left field it's a good idea otherwise look at the background of the people pushing it. It makes no sense for WV to sue Apple over this unless there's another agent pushing their puppet to make the move.
Score: 47 Votes (Like | Disagree)
11 weeks ago
Bloody fascist. Just like those on the left in the EU pushing chat control for everyone except themselves.
Score: 42 Votes (Like | Disagree)
dannyyankou Avatar
11 weeks ago
They should spend more effort going after the predators who are actually sending and soliciting these images instead of going after Apple. There should absolutely be parental controls, along with good parenting, to protect minors. But I think most people don’t want a surveillance state.
Score: 34 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Related Apple News: Sport | Mac | Entertainment | Health | Local News