Apple's Return to Intel Rumored to Extend to iPhone - MacRumorsOpen MenuShow RoundupsShow Forums menuVisit ForumsOpen Sidebar
Skip to Content

Apple's Return to Intel Rumored to Extend to iPhone

Intel is expected to begin supplying some Mac and iPad chips in a few years, and the latest rumor claims the partnership might extend to the iPhone.

Intel Inside iPhone Feature
In a research note with investment firm GF Securities this week, obtained by MacRumors, analyst Jeff Pu said he and his colleagues "now expect" Intel to reach a supply deal with Apple for at least some non-pro iPhone chips starting in 2028.

The non-pro iPhone chips would be manufactured with Intel's future 14A process, according to Pu.

The research note did not provide any other details about these potential plans, but based on the stated timeframe, Intel could start supplying Apple with the A22 chip for devices like the "iPhone 20" and "iPhone 20e" in around three years from now.

Importantly, there is no indication that Intel would play a role in designing the iPhone chips, with its involvement expected to be strictly limited to fabrication. Apple would continue to design iPhone chips, and Intel would start to handle a smaller percentage of manufacturing alongside Apple's primary chipmaker TSMC.

Last month, Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo said he expects Intel to begin shipping Apple's lowest-end M-series chip for select Mac and iPad models as early as mid-2027. For this, Kuo said Apple plans to utilize Intel's 18A process, which is the "earliest available sub-2nm advanced node manufactured in North America."

Intel supplying Apple-designed, Arm-based chips would differ from the era of Intel-based Macs, which used Intel-designed processors with x86 architecture.

Apple reaching a chip supply deal with Intel would boost its reliance on an American manufacturing company and help to diversify its supply chain.

Intel previously supplied Apple with cellular modems for some iPhone 7 to iPhone 11 models.

Tags: Intel, Jeff Pu

Popular Stories

iPhone 18 Pro Deep Red Feature

iPhone 18 Pro Launching Later This Year With These 12 New Features

Wednesday March 18, 2026 7:39 am PDT by
While the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max are not expected to launch for another six months or so, there are already plenty of rumors about the devices. It was initially reported that the iPhone 18 Pro models would have fully under-screen Face ID, with only a front camera visible in the top-left corner of the screen. However, the latest rumors indicate that only one Face ID component...
Apple Logo Sketch Feature

Apple Has Now Unveiled Eight New Products This Month

Tuesday March 17, 2026 9:25 am PDT by
Apple has unveiled a whopping eight new products so far this March, including an iPhone 17e, iPad Air models with the M4 chip, MacBook Air models with the M5 chip, MacBook Pro models with M5 Pro and M5 Max chips, an updated Studio Display, a higher-end Studio Display XDR, and now the AirPods Max 2 this week. iPhone 17e features the same overall design as the iPhone 16e, but it gains Apple's...
ios 26 4 yellow

Here Are Apple's Release Notes for iOS 26.4

Wednesday March 18, 2026 11:56 am PDT by
Apple provided developers and public beta testers with the release candidate versions of iOS 26.4 and iPadOS 26.4, which means we're going to see a public launch as soon as next week. The RC versions of the software include Apple's official release notes, giving us final details on what's included in the update. Apple Music - Playlist Playground (beta) generates a playlist from your...

Top Rated Comments

Apple Knowledge Navigator Avatar
15 weeks ago
This truly has been the week of April Fools news.
Score: 35 Votes (Like | Disagree)
15 weeks ago
Small Rant: Every time one of these stories drops, headlines like “Apple’s Return to Intel” make me wince a little. Sure, the article eventually clarifies that Intel isn’t designing anything here, but the headline alone frames it as some dramatic reversal, like Apple suddenly bailed on Apple Silicon and went crawling back.

For people who actually follow this stuff, we know better. We read past the headline, we care about the architecture, the supply chain, the roadmap, all of it. But for everyone else, it sends the wrong signal.

When Apple used Intel chips before, they were genuinely dependent on Intel’s roadmap, stuck moving only as fast as Intel could innovate. That’s not remotely what’s happening now. This time, Intel is simply one of several manufacturers building Apple’s chips. Apple still owns the design, the direction, and the pace. The headline just doesn’t reflect that reality.
Score: 33 Votes (Like | Disagree)
WarmWinterHat Avatar
15 weeks ago
I don't care who fabs the chips. If they pass Apple's quality controls, then they are good enough for me. 👍🏻
Score: 27 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Black Magic Avatar
15 weeks ago

Small Rant: Every time one of these stories drops, headlines like “Apple’s Return to Intel” make me wince a little. Sure, the article eventually clarifies that Intel isn’t designing anything here, but the headline alone frames it as some dramatic reversal, like Apple suddenly bailed on Apple Silicon and went crawling back.

For people who actually follow this stuff, we know better. We read past the headline, we care about the architecture, the supply chain, the roadmap, all of it. But for everyone else, it sends the wrong signal.

When Apple used Intel chips before, they were genuinely dependent on Intel’s roadmap, stuck moving only as fast as Intel could innovate. That’s not remotely what’s happening now. This time, Intel is simply one of several manufacturers building Apple’s chips. Apple still owns the design, the direction, and the pace. The headline just doesn’t reflect that reality.
So are you suggesting that Macrumors is using sensational headlines for clickbait?
Score: 16 Votes (Like | Disagree)
veggiespam Avatar
15 weeks ago
Elsewhere online, people say the "A" means "Angstrom". So, we finally are ditching the nanometer "nm" for a much cooler abbreviation: "Å". Now, can we please start using the proper symbol.
Score: 13 Votes (Like | Disagree)
15 weeks ago

When are they gonna get that cancer called Tim Cook out of that company!

Intel is the main reason they started making their own chips.

Why would you go back to the same worthless trash company that can’t adhere to thermal thresholds causing overheating repeatedly

That’s one of those companies that just should’ve been left to die

It’s been a good run Apple if this is what you end up doing because many of us are probably not gonna stick with your brand
Thanks for telling us you didn’t read the article.
This might shock you a little bit… But apple doesn’t actually *produce* the chips they use, just like they don’t produce the displays, cameras, etc they use.
They designed them, which is very different from producing them.
Apple is not returning to Intel *designed* chips.
Score: 12 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Related Apple News: Opinion | Mac | Buyers Guide | Iphone | Motoring