Apple Wins Appeals Battle in Ongoing Patent Infringement War With VirnetX, Could Save $502.8 Million

Apple has been embroiled in a patent dispute with VirnetX for well over a decade, and the company today won an appeals verdict that could ultimately save it from having to pay VirnetX $502.8 million in patent infringement fees.

virnetx apple
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on Thursday confirmed a ruling by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office invalidating a pair of patents that VirnetX used in its patent infringement lawsuit against Apple, according to Reuters.

Apple in 2020 was ordered to pay VirnetX $503 million for infringing on VPN patents owned by VirnetX with the iPhone's VPN on demand feature. The two patents that have been invalidated were involved in that lawsuit, and now Apple might get the entire judgment vacated.

Apple appealed the $502.8 million award verdict after it was rendered, with both Apple and VirnetX presenting arguments in the appeal back in September. VirnetX attorney Jeff Lamken said at the time that if the court ultimately sided with the USPTO and invalidated the patents in the patent validity case, VirnetX could "have a big problem." He said that he did not think VirnetX would have an "enforceable judgment" in that situation, so this is potentially a major win for Apple.

With the patents now invalidated, VirnetX and Apple will again meet in court over the initial appeals case that Apple filed to determine whether Apple will need to pay up, and it's looking like the $502.8 million verdict will be thrown out.

Regardless of how this case plays out, Apple was forced to pay VirnetX $440 million for violating VirnetX's communications security patents with the FaceTime and iMessage features.

VirnetX is largely viewed a patent holding company or "patent troll" that does not offer actual products or services. It generates revenue by litigating technology companies that infringe on its patents, though it does also market its "War Room" software for authenticated meetings.

Popular Stories

Aston Martin CarPlay Ultra Screen

Apple's CarPlay Ultra to Expand to These Vehicle Brands Later This Year

Sunday February 1, 2026 10:08 am PST by
Last year, Apple launched CarPlay Ultra, the long-awaited next-generation version of its CarPlay software system for vehicles. Nearly nine months later, CarPlay Ultra is still limited to Aston Martin's latest luxury vehicles, but that should change fairly soon. In May 2025, Apple said many other vehicle brands planned to offer CarPlay Ultra, including Hyundai, Kia, and Genesis. In his Powe...
Apple Logo Black

Apple's Next Launch is 'Imminent'

Sunday February 1, 2026 12:31 pm PST by
The calendar has turned to February, and a new report indicates that Apple's next product launch is "imminent," in the form of new MacBook Pro models. "All signs point to an imminent launch of next-generation MacBook Pros that retain the current form factor but deliver faster chips," Bloomberg's Mark Gurman said on Sunday. "I'm told the new models — code-named J714 and J716 — are slated...
Apple MacBook Pro M4 hero

New MacBook Pros Reportedly Launching Alongside macOS 26.3

Sunday February 1, 2026 5:42 am PST by
Apple is planning to launch new MacBook Pro models with M5 Pro and M5 Max chips alongside macOS 26.3, according to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman. "Apple's faster MacBook Pros are planned for the macOS 26.3 release cycle," wrote Gurman, in his Power On newsletter today. "I'm told the new models — code-named J714 and J716 — are slated for the macOS 26.3 software cycle, which runs from...
iOS 26

iOS 26.3 and iOS 26.4 Will Add These New Features to Your iPhone

Tuesday February 3, 2026 7:47 am PST by
We are still waiting for the iOS 26.3 Release Candidate to come out, so the first iOS 26.4 beta is likely still at least a week or two away. Following beta testing, iOS 26.4 will likely be released to the general public in March or April. Below, we have recapped known or rumored iOS 26.3 and iOS 26.4 features so far. iOS 26.3 iPhone to Android Transfer Tool iOS 26.3 makes it easier...
14 inch MacBook Pro Keyboard

Apple Changes How You Order a Mac

Saturday January 31, 2026 10:51 am PST by
Apple recently updated its online store with a new ordering process for Macs, including the MacBook Air, MacBook Pro, iMac, Mac mini, Mac Studio, and Mac Pro. There used to be a handful of standard configurations available for each Mac, but now you must configure a Mac entirely from scratch on a feature-by-feature basis. In other words, ordering a new Mac now works much like ordering an...

Top Rated Comments

ct2k7 Avatar
37 months ago
VirtnetX stopped Apple from making FaceTime an open standard. I won’t forget.
Score: 29 Votes (Like | Disagree)
CWallace Avatar
37 months ago
XeroxPARC stole the mouse from Stanford and Xerox both invested in Apple at the time (20%) which allowed access to PARC and one of the stated reasons for that investment was the hope Apple could commercialize PARC technology.

And Apple was insured by Xerox, resulting in if PARC had sued Apple and won, Xerox would have paid their own award.

So PARC influenced the Macintosh, but it was certainly not direct IP infringement as it did not use PARC's code as the foundation and PARC might not even have patented any of it. The Macintosh GUI also had many features that PARC's GUI did not have, including drop-down menus and such.
Score: 24 Votes (Like | Disagree)
ronntaylor Avatar
37 months ago

Of course. Apple steals & deliberately infringes on other company's tech/ip and then has the complete nerve to play victim, refuses to pay what they should for said theft, and drags the company through the courts.

From XeroxPARC to this. Same as it ever was.
Guess you didn't read the article:


The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Court on Thursday confirmed a ruling by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office invalidating a pair of patents that VirnetX used in its patent infringement lawsuit against Apple...
Score: 19 Votes (Like | Disagree)
EmotionalSnow Avatar
37 months ago

Of course. Apple steals & deliberately infringes on other company's tech/ip and then has the complete nerve to play victim, refuses to pay what they should for said theft, and drags the company through the courts.

From XeroxPARC to this. Same as it ever was.
Except that their patents are unenforceable and invalid. They were granted erroneously.
Score: 14 Votes (Like | Disagree)
CWallace Avatar
37 months ago

It certainly was infringement by Apple as Apple never got a licence for Xeorx's gui to begin with.
Apple didn't need a license for it because they didn't use any of its code as the foundation for the first Mac OS. They took it as inspiration and modified it in many significant ways - ways that made it a better OS than the original Alto OS.

If you look at the Alto's OS and the first Macintosh's OS, the only thing they really share in common is both are in black and white.
Score: 14 Votes (Like | Disagree)
JM Avatar
37 months ago
Now THIS is Apple News that can bring us all together like the good ol’ days.

?
Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)