Latest iOS 16.1 Beta Removes Adaptive Transparency Toggle for Original AirPods Pro, Confirming Bug - MacRumorsOpen MenuShow RoundupsShow Forums menuVisit ForumsOpen Sidebar
Skip to Content

Latest iOS 16.1 Beta Removes Adaptive Transparency Toggle for Original AirPods Pro, Confirming Bug

The iOS 16.1 beta that was released to developers today removes the erroneous Adaptive Transparency toggle that was added for the original AirPods Pro and the AirPods Max in the prior beta.

adaptive transparency airpods pro
After updating last week, AirPods Pro and AirPods Max owners running the AirPods firmware beta found an "Adaptive Transparency" toggle in the AirPods settings, and it was initially assumed that Apple had brought the Adaptive Transparency feature of the AirPods Pro 2 to older AirPods models.

Bloomberg's Mark Gurman yesterday said that the Adaptive Transparency option was actually a bug, which Apple has now confirmed by removing the setting in the current beta. It was decidedly curious that Apple opted to bring a major AirPods Pro 2 feature to the original AirPods Pro, so it makes sense that it was a mistake and that the setting was accidentally made visible on devices that do not support it.

Adaptive Transparency is an AirPods Pro 2-exclusive feature that is enabled by the new H2 chip in the device. It is designed to allow the ‌AirPods Pro‌ to quiet loud sounds, such as sirens, construction work, or loud speakers at a concert without blocking out all noise.

Related Roundup: AirPods Pro 3
Buyer's Guide: AirPods Pro (Neutral)
Related Forum: AirPods

Popular Stories

Sony WF 1000XM6 vs AirPods Pro 3 Thumb 2

AirPods Pro 3 vs. Sony WF-1000XM6: Which Flagship Earbuds Should You Buy?

Tuesday April 21, 2026 9:44 am PDT by
Sony refreshed its earbuds earlier this year, introducing the $330 WF-1000XM6 earbuds to compete with the $249 AirPods Pro 3 that came out last September. We compared Sony's new earbuds with Apple's latest model to see which is better. Subscribe to the MacRumors YouTube channel for more videos. Sony's XM6 earbuds are smaller than the AirPods Pro 3 because there's no stem, but the in-ear fit...
airpods pro 3 glitter blue

What to Expect From the Next AirPods Pro, Launching as Soon as This Year

Wednesday April 22, 2026 2:34 pm PDT by
Apple is working on a new version of the AirPods Pro, which could come as soon as this year. The AirPods are expected to be a variant of the current AirPods Pro, which suggests they won't be called the AirPods Pro 4. Cameras Multiple sources have said Apple is developing AirPods Pro that have tiny infrared cameras. The cameras won't be used to take photos or videos like an iPhone camera,...
airpods pro 3 design

'AirPods Ultra' Rumored to Feature a Major Upgrade Over AirPods Pro

Thursday April 30, 2026 8:40 am PDT by
In a social media post this week, Bloomberg's Mark Gurman reiterated that Apple is planning to release new AirPods with cameras "for Siri." Last month, Gurman said these AirPods will likely be priced above the current AirPods Pro 3, which Apple sells for $249. As a result, he said Apple is likely considering using "AirPods Ultra" branding for the camera-equipped AirPods. "AirPods Ultra"...

Top Rated Comments

ProfessionalFan Avatar
47 months ago

Just out of interest, did the toggle actually do anything? Or was it just a UI bug?
UI bug, it did not change or add any feature on the actual product.
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)
47 months ago
There is no sinister work at play here.

The H2 is the only chip capable of Adaptive Transparency due to its high sampling rate.

So indeed, it was a bug.
Score: 7 Votes (Like | Disagree)
MrGimper Avatar
47 months ago
Just out of interest, did the toggle actually do anything? Or was it just a UI bug?
Score: 7 Votes (Like | Disagree)
ProfessionalFan Avatar
47 months ago

There is no sinister work at play here.
Yep, I swear EVERY little thing is called out as a conspiracy here by someone. Even this.
Score: 5 Votes (Like | Disagree)
GMShadow Avatar
47 months ago

That's one reason I try to eat alone as often as possible.
Are you doing that intentionally, or is there a conspiracy to keep people from eating with you? 🤔
Score: 4 Votes (Like | Disagree)
ProfessionalFan Avatar
47 months ago

“Bug” 😏
What would it be otherwise? Of course it was a bug.
Score: 3 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Related Apple News: Mac | World News | Reviews | South Africa | Culture