9th Circuit Rules Apple Owes Retail Workers for Time Spent in Security Screenings - MacRumorsOpen MenuShow RoundupsShow Forums menuVisit ForumsOpen Sidebar
Skip to Content

9th Circuit Rules Apple Owes Retail Workers for Time Spent in Security Screenings

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Wednesday said Apple must pay over 12,000 retail workers in California for the time spent waiting for compulsory bag searches at the end of their shifts (via Reuters).

apple employees trio

A unanimous three-judge panel reversed a judge who had tossed the case and ordered him to enter summary judgment for the plaintiffs, after the California Supreme Court in response to certified questions in the case said in February that time spent undergoing security checks is compensable under state law.

The unanimous court decision, which dates back to a class action lawsuit filed against Apple in 2013, lines up with a previous California Supreme Court ruling that determined that staff time spent in security screenings was compensable.

Employees alleged that Apple subjected them to mandatory bag checks that were conducted off the clock, leaving them uncompensated for their time. At the trial level, Apple actually won the lawsuit when the court ruled that Apple employees chose to bring personal bags to work and dismissed the case, but the decision was appealed and brought to a higher court.

The Ninth Circuit panel said on Wednesday that the U.S. District Court that handled the original lawsuit had mistaken in its judgement when it sided with Apple over the case.

Apple requires all personal packages, bags, and Apple devices that belong to retail employees to be checked by a manager or security before an employee is allowed to leave the store for any reason, including breaks, lunch, and the end of shifts.

Employees are also required to clock out before submitting to an exit search, and have estimated that the time spent waiting and undergoing searches ranges from five to 20 minutes. On busy days, some employees have waited for up to 45 minutes waiting for a bag check.

Prior evaluation of the case, which reached class action lawsuit status in 2015, suggested that Apple could have to pay as much as $60 million should it be required to offer employees back compensation for the time spent undergoing bag checks.

Popular Stories

Apple Logo 16x9 US Flag Feature

Apple Subpoenas Samsung in South Korea Over DOJ Antitrust Case

Thursday April 9, 2026 4:20 am PDT by
Apple has asked a U.S. court to formally request internal Samsung documents from South Korea as part of discovery in the DOJ's ongoing antitrust lawsuit against the company. The DOJ filed suit against Apple in March 2024, alongside a number of governments, alleging the company used App Store rules, developer restrictions, and control over key iPhone features to stifle competition. After Apple...
Jon Prosser Rainbow

Jon Prosser Still Not Fully Cooperating in Apple's iOS 26 Trade Secrets Lawsuit

Tuesday April 14, 2026 6:57 am PDT by
A joint status report filed yesterday in Apple's trade secrets lawsuit against YouTuber Jon Prosser and Michael Ramacciotti shows Prosser is still failing to comply with discovery, prompting Apple to seek a court order to compel him. The latest filing, submitted to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California yesterday, covers developments since the parties' last update in ...
app store blue banner epic 1

Epic Games Wins Reversal of Stay in App Store Fee Legal Battle

Wednesday April 29, 2026 5:05 am PDT by
Apple will not be able to delay a district court battle over fee calculations while it waits to hear whether the U.S. Supreme Court will weigh in on the latest developments in its long-running dispute with Epic Games. On Tuesday, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed an earlier decision letting Apple keep its current zero-fee link-out commission structure in place while it appeals to...

Top Rated Comments

74 months ago
That's absolutely the right decision. Can't believe Apple, being so righteous and all, would not do this on its own.

But on top of it all, you should not hire people if you cannot trust them not to steal.
Score: 39 Votes (Like | Disagree)
74 months ago
If the employees don’t like bag searches in their own time, they should manufacture their own mobile phone and develop their own App Store, not throw their toys out of the pram.

INB4 the usual suspects.
Score: 27 Votes (Like | Disagree)
ThomasJL Avatar
74 months ago
Good. Apple shouldn't be treating its employees as potential criminals. How degrading and disrespectful! I'm sure there is no shortage of people on this forum who will disagree because they belong to the Apple-can-do-no-wrong apologist camp.
Score: 19 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Expos of 1969 Avatar
74 months ago

Good. Apple shouldn't be treating its employees as potential criminals. How degrading and disrespectful! I'm sure there is no shortage of people on this forum who will disagree because they belong to the Apple-can-do-no-wrong apologist camp.
Nothing wrong with security measures but as the legal ruling says, the employer must pay the employees for their time. Apple certainly makes stupid decisions at times all with the aim of screwing employees and customers. A real lack of common sense which fortunately comes back to bite the company in the ass in this case.
Score: 18 Votes (Like | Disagree)
74 months ago
The company that cares is the image they want to get across, in reality they're more like what Ricky Gervais said at The Golden Globes lol.
Score: 13 Votes (Like | Disagree)
74 months ago

and simply ban employees from bringing their bags for work. Just a thought.
It's a terrible thought at that. Have you never taken lunch to a workplace before? Have you ever bought something on the way to work, or planned on taking a change of clothes for after work? Where do you draw the line, clothes with no pockets?
Score: 11 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Related Apple News: Business | Travel | Iphone | Ipad | Education