Apple-Led Rockstar Consortium Sells Remaining Patent Portfolio for $900 Million - MacRumorsOpen MenuShow RoundupsShow Forums menuVisit ForumsOpen Sidebar
Skip to Content

Apple-Led Rockstar Consortium Sells Remaining Patent Portfolio for $900 Million

by

San Francisco patent company RPX today announced it is purchasing more than 4,000 telecommunications patents from Rockstar, an Apple-led consortium that previously acquired the patents from bankrupt Nortel Networks. The sale will net Rockstar $900 million, a fraction of the $4.5 billion the conglomerate of technology companies paid for the entire patent portfolio in 2011, although many of the high-value patents were previously dispersed to the consortium's members.

rockstar-logo
As reported by The Wall Street Journal, RPX confirmed its subsidiary RPX Clearinghouse, will license the patents to a syndicate of technology companies that include Google and Cisco Systems. RPX is making the patents available with non-exclusive licenses to all syndicate members, whose funds helped pay for the purchase. RPX also will license the patents to outside companies under fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms, and members of the Rockstar consortium will retain licenses for the patents.

Rockstar was formed in 2011 when Apple, BlackBerry, Ericsson, Microsoft, and Sony joined together to purchase patents from bankrupt communications company Nortel. The consortium purchased 6,000 patents, with 4,000 patents being held under the Rockstar umbrella and the remaining 2,000 patents being distributed to member companies.

The sale of the patents follows Rockstar's rather unsuccessful attempts to license the patents. The consortium also filed patent infringement lawsuits against a variety of technology companies with Google and Cisco recently settling their disputes for undisclosed amounts. As part of this patent sale to RPX, Rockstar has agreed to drop its existing suits against Samsung, LG and HTC.

Top Rated Comments

macs4nw Avatar
149 months ago
It sounds like they cherry picked the best patents out of the lot and then sold off the rest. However, they still retain access to all of the licenses included in the purchase.
Seems like a win/win.
Or perhaps just cutting/mitigating their losses, and moving on…..
Score: 4 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Eraserhead Avatar
149 months ago
Or perhaps just cutting/mitigating their losses, and moving on…..

Or perhaps a bit of both ;).
Score: 3 Votes (Like | Disagree)
149 months ago
The fact that Rockstar and its members (Apple included) keep can continue to use the patents is a good thing, since this should prevent any legal actions later. The only question I have is how they do an ROI on something like this. I mean, they spent $4.5 billion on the patents. They sell some of them and get $1 billion back, so is the ROI the reduction in lawsuits? Given all the other issues they have gone to court for, I am sure they can stick a big number on that, but $3.5 billion?

Basically just curious, since from the outside it looks like they may not invested well on this one, but I am probably missing something.

It sounds like they cherry picked the best patents out of the lot and then sold off the rest. However, they still retain access to all of the licenses included in the purchase.
Seems like a win/win.
Score: 2 Votes (Like | Disagree)
cjmillsnun Avatar
149 months ago
Or perhaps just cutting/mitigating their losses, and moving on…..

That was my thinking given the below...



The sale of the patents follows Rockstar's rather unsuccessful attempts to license the patents.
Score: 1 Votes (Like | Disagree)
149 months ago
The fact that Rockstar and its members (Apple included) keep can continue to use the patents is a good thing, since this should prevent any legal actions later. The only question I have is how they do an ROI on something like this. I mean, they spent $4.5 billion on the patents. They sell some of them and get $1 billion back, so is the ROI the reduction in lawsuits? Given all the other issues they have gone to court for, I am sure they can stick a big number on that, but $3.5 billion?

Basically just curious, since from the outside it looks like they may not invested well on this one, but I am probably missing something.
Score: 1 Votes (Like | Disagree)

Popular Stories

Apple Event Logo

Apple's Next Era Begins September 1

Thursday May 7, 2026 10:36 am PDT by
Apple recently announced that Tim Cook will be stepping down as CEO later this year, after 15 years of leading the company. Effective September 1, Apple's hardware engineering chief John Ternus will become the company's next CEO, while Cook will become executive chairman of Apple's board of directors. In his new role, Apple said Cook will assist with "certain aspects" of the company,...
Instagram Feature 2

PSA: Instagram Encrypted Messaging Ends on Friday, May 8

Tuesday May 5, 2026 8:24 am PDT by
Instagram will remove end-to-end encryption for direct messages between users from May 8, 2026. When the date comes around, Meta will potentially be able to see the contents of all messages between users on the social media platform. Encrypting messages has been an optional feature in Instagram since 2023, but in March of this year the social media platform quietly updated a help page to say ...
macbook neo launch day

Apple May Drop Base $599 MacBook Neo as Chip, DRAM Costs Climb

Thursday May 7, 2026 4:55 am PDT by
Apple is considering dropping the cheapest MacBook Neo configuration as one possible response to the rising cost of building the popular laptop, according to Taiwan-based tech columnist and former Bloomberg reporter Tim Culpan. The Neo currently starts at $599 for a 256GB model, with a 512GB version at $699. Writing in his latest Culpium newsletter, Culpan says cutting the entry-level...
Related Apple News: Health | Iphone | Ipad | South Africa | Reviews