Brazilian 'iPhone' Trademark Lawsuit Ends With Apple and IGB 'Close To Settlement' - MacRumorsOpen MenuShow RoundupsShow Forums menuVisit ForumsOpen Sidebar
Skip to Content

Brazilian 'iPhone' Trademark Lawsuit Ends With Apple and IGB 'Close To Settlement'

gradiente_iphoneForbes reports that Apple and Brazilian company IGB have agreed to end their lawsuit over the iPhone trademark in Brazil, and are close to reaching a settlement agreement.

According to Brazil’s largest daily, Folha de São Paulo, both companies have agreed to end the lawsuit over iPhone and come to some sort of “pacific agreement,” the paper reported on Saturday. Apple has paid millions for its exclusive use of the word iPhone in the past and will likely pay IGB as well.

IGB had applied for the "iPhone" trademarke in Brazil in 2000, years before Apple's phone was launched, and was granted the trademark in 2008.

Apple challenged the trademark on the basis that IGB had failed to use the trademark until it was close to expiration, but the Brazilian Industrial Property Institute ruled in IGB's favor after it launched a low-cost Android smartphone using the iPhone brand late last year. Apple took the matter to court, but has now withdrawn the legal action after IGB suggested that it was open to selling the trademark.

Apple's current use of the "iPhone" name in Brazil is not currently being hampered while the dispute plays out, with the company being allowed to continue selling the iPhone under its popular name and Apple retaining control over the iPhone name for other categories of use such as software.

Apple is expected to make a cash settlement for exclusive rights over the name in Brazil. It previously settled a dispute over the iPad trademark in China for $60 million, but there is no word yet on a settlement amount for the Brazilian case.

Related Forum: iPhone

Popular Stories

imac video apple feature

Apple Released Yet Another New Product Today

Friday March 20, 2026 2:39 pm PDT by
Apple has unveiled a whopping nine new products so far this March, including an iPhone 17e, iPad Air models with the M4 chip, MacBook Air models with the M5 chip, MacBook Pro models with M5 Pro and M5 Max chips, the all-new MacBook Neo, an updated Studio Display, a higher-end Studio Display XDR, AirPods Max 2, and now the Nike Powerbeats Pro 2. iPhone 17e features the same overall design as...
ios 26 4 pastel

iOS 26.4: Top 10 New Features Coming to Your iPhone

Friday March 20, 2026 2:44 pm PDT by
iOS 26.4 isn't the major update with new Siri features that we hoped for, but there are some useful quality of life improvements, and a little bit of fun with an AI playlist generator and new emoji characters. Playlist Playground - Apple Music has a Playlist Playground option that lets you generate playlists from text-based descriptions. You can include moods, feelings, activities, or...
iPhone 18 Pro Deep Red Feature

iPhone 18 Pro Launching Later This Year With These 12 New Features

Wednesday March 18, 2026 7:39 am PDT by
While the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max are not expected to launch for another six months or so, there are already plenty of rumors about the devices. It was initially reported that the iPhone 18 Pro models would have fully under-screen Face ID, with only a front camera visible in the top-left corner of the screen. However, the latest rumors indicate that only one Face ID component...

Top Rated Comments

0815 Avatar
170 months ago
Apple should just close their factories in any country trying to blackmail them. Face it , it is "Blackmail" we're talking about. Everyone in the world knows that "iPxxxxx" is synonymous with the Apple Brand...

What? Apple didn't do their homework, they didn't research where that name is already used and failed to acquire the rights to use that name from the rightful owners. I don't think many people in 2000 were expecting Apple to come out with an iPhone ... It iPhone might be synonymous today with Apple, not back than.
Score: 7 Votes (Like | Disagree)
170 months ago
Well they had the trademark before apple.....
Score: 7 Votes (Like | Disagree)
170 months ago
Translation: Apple opened the door to their enormous vault at Gringotts and turned back to IGB and said "So, how do you want to resolve this?".

They should charge apple 30% of all iphone sales.
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
macs4nw Avatar
170 months ago
they were simply lucky to have copyrighted that name

Exactly. They had it first, and after 2007 they realized the value of that little 'i'. Who can blame them.
Score: 5 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Oletros Avatar
170 months ago
Apple should just close their factories in any country trying to blackmail them.

And it is a good thing that Apple is not ruled by people like those saying: leave UK, leave Brazil, leave anywhere were courts have not agreed with us

Face it , it is "Blackmail" we're talking about. Everyone in the world knows that "iPxxxxx" is synonymous with the Apple Brand...

In 2.000? Highly doubtful
Score: 5 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Oletros Avatar
170 months ago
..and Apple should give them the finger and challenge them to prove in court that the trademark "infringement" is damaging enough to warrant such a claim.

You know that Apple lost the trial, don´t you?
Score: 5 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Related Apple News: Use Text Shortcuts On Apple Devices | Apple Ai Strategy 2024 | China | Airpods Max | Ipad Pro 2024 Specs