Apple Raised UK Banking Costs, Lawsuit Alleges - MacRumorsOpen MenuShow RoundupsShow Forums menuVisit ForumsOpen Sidebar
Skip to Content

Apple Raised UK Banking Costs, Lawsuit Alleges

A new UK class action lawsuit against Apple seeks billions in damages by alleging that the company unlawfully restricted competition in contactless payments on the iPhone through Apple Pay, The Guardian reports.

Apple Pay Feature
The proposed opt-out collective action filed this week in the UK alleges that Apple abused its position in the market by limiting access to the iPhone's near-field communication (NFC) technology and charging fees to banks for the use of ‌Apple Pay‌. The claim seeks up to £1.5 billion (approximately $2 billion) in damages on behalf of an estimated 50 million UK consumers.

The complainant argues that ‌Apple Pay‌ has effectively been the only contactless mobile payment option available to iPhone users in the UK since its launch in 2015. According to the filing, Apple declined to grant third-party developers access to the iPhone's NFC hardware and Secure Element, preventing rival wallets from operating on equal terms and leaving banks and card issuers with no alternative but to participate in ‌Apple Pay‌ if they wished to offer mobile contactless payments to iPhone users.

The case heavily focuses on fees Apple reportedly charges issuing banks for ‌Apple Pay‌ transactions, commonly cited in industry reporting as approximately 0.15% of the transaction value in the UK. These fees are allegedly not consistent with industry norms and were only possible because Apple restricted competition on its platform. The suit further contends that banks passed the costs of those fees on to consumers through higher charges across a wide range of financial products, including current accounts, credit cards, savings accounts, and mortgages.

Around 98% of UK consumers hold accounts with banks that support ‌Apple Pay‌ and were therefore exposed to higher costs regardless of whether they personally used the service. On that basis, the claim seeks damages on a population-wide basis. The average payout per affected consumer would be relatively modest, estimated at roughly £26 to £35 if the claim were successful.

In a statement, Apple said that the lawsuit was "misguided and should be dismissed," adding:


Apple Pay is a seamless and secure way for users to make contactless payments, and one of many payment options available to consumers. Apple does not charge fees to consumers or merchants for using Apple Pay, and banks see meaningful benefits from offering Apple Pay to their customers - most notably fraud reduction.

Apple also emphasized changes to its platform that have occurred since the period covered by the claim. The company said it has recently expanded access to key technologies, including NFC and the Secure Element, allowing third-party developers to offer contactless payments within their own apps in the UK.

The claim has been lodged with the Competition Appeal Tribunal, which must determine whether the case can proceed as a collective action.

Note: Due to the political or social nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Political News forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.

Popular Stories

General YouTube Feature Redux

Apple Sued by Three YouTube Channels

Monday April 6, 2026 8:53 am PDT by
Three established YouTube channels have sued Apple, alleging that the company violated the U.S. Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) by unlawfully accessing and scraping millions of copyrighted videos from YouTube to train its AI models. In a class action lawsuit filed in California federal court last week, the owners of the YouTube channels h3h3Productions (plus H3 Podcast and H3 Podcast ...
app store blue banner epic 1

Apple Asks Court to Pause App Store Fee Fight While It Petitions Supreme Court in Epic Games Case

Monday April 6, 2026 1:32 pm PDT by
Apple plans to ask the United States Supreme Court to weigh in on the App Store fee restrictions and contempt of court ruling levied against it in the ongoing Epic Games vs. Apple legal battle. In a filing on April 3 (via TechCrunch), Apple asked the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to hold off on a plan that would see the U.S. Northern District of California decide on a reasonable commission...
Apple Logo 16x9 US Flag Feature

Apple Subpoenas Samsung in South Korea Over DOJ Antitrust Case

Thursday April 9, 2026 4:20 am PDT by
Apple has asked a U.S. court to formally request internal Samsung documents from South Korea as part of discovery in the DOJ's ongoing antitrust lawsuit against the company. The DOJ filed suit against Apple in March 2024, alongside a number of governments, alleging the company used App Store rules, developer restrictions, and control over key iPhone features to stifle competition. After Apple...

Top Rated Comments

I7guy Avatar
15 weeks ago
Good luck in winning. Although it is the UK. Next up. Class action lawsuit because iPhones are locked down to iOS.
Score: 14 Votes (Like | Disagree)
15 weeks ago
I don’t recall card processors changing their fees when Apple Pay was released. The rumored 0.15% fee is trivial compared to the usual 3% (or more) card processing fees, and the reduction in fraud would almost certainly have more than made up for the tiny difference.

They know this which is why they’re trying to claim Apple Pay is the reason OTHER products had price increases (like interest on loans/cards or account fees).

What a joke of a lawsuit.
Score: 12 Votes (Like | Disagree)
cjbryce Avatar
15 weeks ago
This is, IMVHO, a frivolous lawsuit aimed at a respondent with deep pockets. I hope it's chucked out very quickly.

Many years ago I was in charge of a project for major UK banking institution to look at the future of the payments business landscape. After about a year's worth deep research my report suggested that other banks weren't really innovators in terms of competition but rather that Apple and Google would enter the payments market and become major players in that space. I and my team were laughed out of the room.

The banks have no-one to blame but themselves.
Score: 12 Votes (Like | Disagree)
CalMin Avatar
15 weeks ago
I think the reduction in fraud is a tangible benefit to banks. With Apple pay a merchant never sees the actual card number being used, so they can't copy your details and go shopping with them later or, worse, keep them on file somewhere for some bad perp.

There's a value to that for merchants and banks. My folks run a small business selling healthcare related stuff for the elderly. The amount of fraud they've seen over the years is shocking. And we all pay for the fraud.
Score: 5 Votes (Like | Disagree)
15 weeks ago
Next UK will sue Apple for using the Apple logo, due to the declining sales of the fruit it’s based off of.

I’m very pro competition, and limiting big companies. But again Apple made the platform and its user base. Why is it punished for having success in what it’s created. Visa and MasterCard also have fees, Samsung Pay.

Then the UK becomes more of a liability, and cost for Apple and they pull out of the country, then there’s truly no competition.
Score: 5 Votes (Like | Disagree)
ThomasJL Avatar
14 weeks ago

Around 98% of UK consumers hold accounts with banks that support Apple Pay and were therefore exposed to higher costs regardless of whether they personally used the service.
How can anyone read that sentence and still side with Apple?

I guess it’s not surprising though. Many people, especially in the U.S., have more sympathy for the ultra-wealthy than they do for ordinary people. Ayn Rand would be proud.

Tim Cook is a bankster.
Score: 4 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Related Apple News: South Africa | News | World News | Politics | Health