Apple's Latest App Store Changes Satisfy EU, No More Fines Coming

by

The European Union is set to accept the June updates that Apple made to its App Store to comply with the Digital Markets Act, reports Reuters. As a result, Apple will not face daily fines for non-compliance.

App Store vs. EU
Apple changed its ‌App Store‌ fee setup and removed its anti-steering rules to meet the demands of the European Commission. Developers can now direct customers to purchase options outside the ‌App Store‌ and even accept payments for digital goods in their apps using third-party payment options.

At the European Commission's direction Apple has split its ‌App Store‌ services options to let developers opt out of certain features for a lower fee. There are now two tiers that developers can pay for. The cheaper one eliminates ratings and reviews, ‌App Store‌ featuring and marketing, search suggestions, automatic app updates, and automatic app downloads across devices. The more expensive tier includes all current ‌App Store‌ features and functionality.

Tier 1 store services cost five percent of an app's revenue, and Tier 2 store services cost 13 percent (10 percent for Small Business Program participants). Apple also charges a two percent initial acquisition fee and a five percent Core Technology Commission (CTC). The CTC replaces the CTF, a controversial fee that charged developers €0.50 per app install after one million installs per year.

Right now, there's a split CTC and CTF system for developers who use external links and those who don't, but by January 1, 2026, Apple will have a single business model that includes the services fee, the initial acquisition fee, and the CTC. At maximum, developers will pay 20 percent, and per-install billing won't exist. Developers who choose limited ‌App Store‌ functionality will pay a 12 percent maximum fee. Small Business Program participants will pay between 10 and 15 percent.

If Apple had not changed its ‌App Store‌ fee structure and linking rules, it could have been fined up to five percent of its average daily worldwide revenue (about €50 million) each day. The European Commission is expected to accept the ‌App Store‌ updates "in the coming weeks," but timing could change.

Apple was already fined €500 million for allegedly violating the Digital Markets Act, but the company has filed an appeal. Apple is protesting both the fine and the new anti-steering rules that the European Commission required.

Note: Due to the political or social nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Political News forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.

Tags: App Store, European Commission, European Union

Popular Stories

Apple Logo Black

Apple Just Made Its Second-Biggest Acquisition Ever After Beats

Thursday January 29, 2026 10:07 am PST by
Apple today confirmed to Reuters that it has acquired Q.ai, an Israeli startup that is working on artificial intelligence technology for audio. Apple paid close to $2 billion for Q.ai, according to sources cited by the Financial Times. That would make this Apple's second-biggest acquisition ever, after it paid $3 billion for the popular headphone and audio brand Beats in 2014. Q.ai has...
Read Full Article • 134 comments
Aston Martin CarPlay Ultra Screen

Apple's CarPlay Ultra to Expand to These Vehicle Brands Later This Year

Sunday February 1, 2026 10:08 am PST by
Last year, Apple launched CarPlay Ultra, the long-awaited next-generation version of its CarPlay software system for vehicles. Nearly nine months later, CarPlay Ultra is still limited to Aston Martin's latest luxury vehicles, but that should change fairly soon. In May 2025, Apple said many other vehicle brands planned to offer CarPlay Ultra, including Hyundai, Kia, and Genesis. In his Powe...
Read Full Article • 86 comments
14 inch MacBook Pro Keyboard

Apple Changes How You Order a Mac

Saturday January 31, 2026 10:51 am PST by
Apple recently updated its online store with a new ordering process for Macs, including the MacBook Air, MacBook Pro, iMac, Mac mini, Mac Studio, and Mac Pro. There used to be a handful of standard configurations available for each Mac, but now you must configure a Mac entirely from scratch on a feature-by-feature basis. In other words, ordering a new Mac now works much like ordering an...
Read Full Article • 125 comments
Apple Logo Black

Apple's Next Launch is 'Imminent'

Sunday February 1, 2026 12:31 pm PST by
The calendar has turned to February, and a new report indicates that Apple's next product launch is "imminent," in the form of new MacBook Pro models. "All signs point to an imminent launch of next-generation MacBook Pros that retain the current form factor but deliver faster chips," Bloomberg's Mark Gurman said on Sunday. "I'm told the new models — code-named J714 and J716 — are slated...
Read Full Article
Apple MacBook Pro M4 hero

New MacBook Pros Reportedly Launching Alongside macOS 26.3

Sunday February 1, 2026 5:42 am PST by
Apple is planning to launch new MacBook Pro models with M5 Pro and M5 Max chips alongside macOS 26.3, according to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman. "Apple's faster MacBook Pros are planned for the macOS 26.3 release cycle," wrote Gurman, in his Power On newsletter today. "I'm told the new models — code-named J714 and J716 — are slated for the macOS 26.3 software cycle, which runs from...
Read Full Article • 134 comments

Top Rated Comments

MacUserFella Avatar
MacUserFella
7 months ago
FINE-ally, am I right?
Score: 11 Votes (Like | Disagree)
klasma Avatar
klasma
7 months ago
From the Reuters article: "All options remain on the table. We are still assessing Apple's proposed changes," the EU watchdog said.
Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)
addamas Avatar
addamas
7 months ago
So apps will be cheaper right? Right?
Score: 9 Votes (Like | Disagree)
con2apple Avatar
con2apple
7 months ago
I know we're on a site for rumors. But wouldn't it be better to wait for official confirmation?
It is rather unlikely that Apple will be allowed to continue charging fees for access to the iPhone. That would be contrary to free competition and would allow Apple to continue earning money out of thin air.

And once again to all Apple fans:
Just imagine if Microsoft and Google charged Apple a fee every time a user installed "iCloud for Windows" or "Music for Android" on their OS. It wouldn't come from an app store, but simply on principle.
When you think about what Apple wants money for right now, maybe your hatred of competition, fair markets, and the EU will cease.
Score: 5 Votes (Like | Disagree)
BaldiMac Avatar
BaldiMac
7 months ago

I know we're on a site for rumors. But wouldn't it be better to wait for official confirmation?
It is rather unlikely that Apple will be allowed to continue charging fees for access to the iPhone. That would be contrary to free competition and would allow Apple to continue earning money out of thin air.

And once again to all Apple fans:
Just imagine if Microsoft and Google charged Apple a fee every time a user installed "iCloud for Windows" or "Music for Android" on their OS. It wouldn't come from an app store, but simply on principle.
When you think about what Apple wants money for right now, maybe your hatred of competition, fair markets, and the EU will cease.
Imagine? So, like, if Microsoft charged a developer for games sold through Target, that would be weird to you? Because they already do that.

Once again... It's perfectly normal for platform owners to charge businesses for access to their platform. Some platforms are open. Some platforms are closed. Some are free. Some charge. That you prefer an open platform is just a preference.


You're not defending your poor sick brother from an evil dictator, you're defending a profit-driven company from having to comply with "laws“.
Ignoring the ad hominem nonsense, you're being misleading here. No one is arguing that the Apple doesn't have to comply with the law. Only that it's a bad law. Personally, I agree with the DMA''s goal of more competition. I just think it is a poor way to go about it.
Score: 5 Votes (Like | Disagree)
surferfb Avatar
surferfb
7 months ago

It would be nice if you could back up your claims.
At least once.
Here's an article from Politico ('https://www.politico.eu/article/apple-to-appeal-e500m--digital-fine-over-eus-silence-in-compliance-talks/'). Here's the key part:

According to correspondence seen by POLITICO, Apple offered last summer to drop its rules ('https://developer.apple.com/news/?id=szrqxadx') on how app developers can communicate with users, but was told by the Commission to hold off, pending feedback from developers.

By late September and following a round of consultations with Apple critics like Spotify, Match Group and Epic Games, executives at the U.S.-based firm began worrying that a lack of feedback from the Commission meant it was teeing up a potential fine and noncompliance decision.

Because what you're saying is clearly false. The EU doesn't constantly change the rules, nor does it act „in bad faith“.

Wake up, already.
You're not defending your poor sick brother from an evil dictator, you're defending a profit-driven company from having to comply with "laws“.
You call telling Apple "don't implement that yet" and then fining Apple for, in part, for not implementing what they told Apple to not implement "operating in good faith"? What part of "declare iPadOS is a gatekeeper despite the fact that iPadOS doesn't meet the quantitative metrics written into the law to be a gatekeeper" is not "changing the rules"?

I'm defending a company pushing back against wrong-headed laws that already have made, and will continue to make, everyone's products worse. Especially when those laws were written by regulators who don't understand what they're doing, have a history of screwing up regulations around tech, and have frozen innovation in their jurisdiction with their regulations.

It's not just Apple saying it either. Meta, had this to say ('https://about.fb.com/news/2025/07/why-the-commissions-decision-undermines-the-goals-of-the-dma/'):

[I]“Our constructive engagement – which pre-dated the launch of any investigation – was publicly noted by the Commission. Yet as 2024 progressed, the goalposts kept shifting and that has continued into 2025. We made proposals but feedback has often not been forthcoming. If feedback was received, it was often inconsistent and untethered from the DMA text. Meanwhile, despite the significant investment that we made to comply and address the Commission’s varying feedback, it kept repeating that it would never be in a position to bless DMA compliance proposals.[/I]
Score: 4 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Read All Comments