Apple Appeals EU Digital Markets Act Interoperability Rules - MacRumorsOpen MenuShow RoundupsShow Forums menuVisit ForumsOpen Sidebar
Skip to Content

Apple Appeals EU Digital Markets Act Interoperability Rules

Apple has filed an appeal against the European Union's Digital Markets Act interoperability requirements, calling the rules "deeply flawed" and a threat to user security (via The Wall Street Journal).

european commission
Apple submitted its challenge to the EU's General Court in Luxembourg on May 30, targeting the Commission's March decision that requires Apple to make iOS more compatible with rival products including smartwatches, headphones, and VR headsets.

Under the DMA, Apple must grant third-party developers access to iOS features typically reserved for its own products, such as allowing notifications to appear on competing wearable devices. The rules also mandate faster data transfers and easier device pairing for non-Apple hardware.

Apple argues the requirements force it to share sensitive user data with competitors, creating security risks. The company specifically highlighted requests from rivals seeking access to notification content and complete WiFi network histories – data that "even Apple doesn't see."

"At Apple, we design our technology to work seamlessly together," a company spokesperson said. "The EU's interoperability requirements threaten that foundation, while creating a process that is unreasonable, costly, and stifles innovation."

The tech giant claims some companies are exploiting the DMA to bypass EU data protection standards. Apple has dedicated 500 engineers to DMA compliance efforts and launched a developer portal for interoperability requests.

Companies violating DMA rules face fines up to 10% of worldwide annual revenue. The Commission can also order business breakups in extreme cases.

Note: Due to the political or social nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Political News forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.

Popular Stories

iPhone 18 Pro Deep Red Feature

iPhone 18 Pro Launching Later This Year With These 12 New Features

Wednesday March 18, 2026 7:39 am PDT by
While the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max are not expected to launch for another six months or so, there are already plenty of rumors about the devices. It was initially reported that the iPhone 18 Pro models would have fully under-screen Face ID, with only a front camera visible in the top-left corner of the screen. However, the latest rumors indicate that only one Face ID component...
ios 26 4 yellow

Here Are Apple's Release Notes for iOS 26.4

Wednesday March 18, 2026 11:56 am PDT by
Apple provided developers and public beta testers with the release candidate versions of iOS 26.4 and iPadOS 26.4, which means we're going to see a public launch as soon as next week. The RC versions of the software include Apple's official release notes, giving us final details on what's included in the update. Apple Music - Playlist Playground (beta) generates a playlist from your...
Apple Logo Sketch Feature

Apple Has Now Unveiled Eight New Products This Month

Tuesday March 17, 2026 9:25 am PDT by
Apple has unveiled a whopping eight new products so far this March, including an iPhone 17e, iPad Air models with the M4 chip, MacBook Air models with the M5 chip, MacBook Pro models with M5 Pro and M5 Max chips, the all-new MacBook Neo, an updated Studio Display, a higher-end Studio Display XDR, and now the AirPods Max 2 this week. iPhone 17e features the same overall design as the iPhone...

Top Rated Comments

WarmWinterHat Avatar
11 months ago

Imagine advocating for apps being able to store your credit card numbers in a plaintext SQL database for digital goods. Idiots.

"We want a choice!". You already do. Android. Not hard to understand. You're essentially reducing choice by making iOS like Android. 🤦‍♂️
I really, really, don't like that comparison. It's not making iPhone like Android, it's making Apple better. The fact that Android already did just means Google is ahead. I don't like ecosystems, at all, and want to be able to mix-and-match as I see fit.

Some of these, I agree, are going to far, but I think there should be a lot more interoperability. I live in a mixed iPhone/Android household (myself on iPhone, and wife on a Pixel).
Score: 37 Votes (Like | Disagree)
WarmWinterHat Avatar
11 months ago

DMA is not a policy to support Users. There is no U of user or C of consumer ANYWHERE in that law. Only the M for market. Which means this is pure protectionism of European companies that can't compete with American companies. Again NO EU company is a "gatekeeper" according to the EU, even though some should absolutely be one.
Bytedance is a gatekeeper and it's Chinese. They aren't all American.

Either way, I don't care where they are from. If American companies want to operate in the EU, they do so under EU rules. American doesn't get to export laws and business practices.
Score: 25 Votes (Like | Disagree)
11 months ago
My biggest worry right now is what America is planning on forcing Apple to do in the near future. While European Union I trust way more with their policies support for Users.
Score: 18 Votes (Like | Disagree)
ItsASpider Avatar
11 months ago

Imagine advocating for apps being able to store your credit card numbers in a plaintext SQL database for digital goods. Idiots.
Imagine thinking that that's how any of this works...

If Apple's software is that fragile and insecure, maybe it just shouldn't exist in the first place.


Please let Apple release iPhone mirroring on macOS just like it was intended. Apple’s secret sauce is their tight integration, the ecosystem.


While EU costumers are happy to now be able to use a standard charging port such as USB-C, thanks to the push of EU, sometimes I think they’re going too far. And iPhone screen mirroring is fundamentally a continuity/handoff feature (never knew the difference between them).
It's worth noting that there is absolutely nothing in EU law that blocks Apple from making screen mirroring available in the EU. Just like there was absolutely nothing that blocked them from allowing PWAs, which they were also called out for by the EU itself. It's why its competitors - despite having to adhere to the same rules - do have these features.


DMA is not a policy to support Users. There is no U of user or C of consumer ANYWHERE in that law. Only the M for market. Which means this is pure protectionism of European companies that can't compete with American companies. Again NO EU company is a "gatekeeper" according to the EU, even though some should absolutely be one.

And if you think "protecionism" isn't bad. It's actually illegal under EU law, a country isn't allowed to give market protection to a company. This would end in large fines from the EC (European Comission). But using this legislation they have reworked this "protection" into a new law.
Just like GDPR doesn't protect citizens privacy, because other legislation easily tramples it.
See, that's the difference between the EU and the US. "Market" is not just "corporate intrests". "Market" in the DMA does mean consumers. But you knew that already. Just as you know that this "protectionism" rant is also bs. The DMA is, just like every other country has, just another anti-trust law. By your warped definition of what "protectionism" is, the EU wouldn't be allowed to have any anti-trust rules, and again, you know that that's just bs.
Score: 16 Votes (Like | Disagree)
11 months ago
Thank goodness I don't live in an EU country.
Score: 16 Votes (Like | Disagree)
11 months ago

I'm with Apple on this one. Apple has always been about integrating hardware and software to create a cohesive environment, The Walled Garden. There's a reason this appeal to millions of users.

It's kind of like telling Chevy their engines have to work in their competitor's vehicles.
Terrible analogy. No one is telling Apple their parts need to work in other companies products. Exactly the opposite, which is why you have the freedom to buy non-Chevy tires for your Chevy. Or windshield wipers. Walk into any auto parts store for an example of how many 3rd party parts integrate with a Chevy car perfectly.
Score: 15 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Related Apple News: Lifestyle | Opinion | World News | Reviews | Culture