EU Opens Non-Compliance Investigations into Apple, Meta, and Google - MacRumorsOpen MenuShow RoundupsShow Forums menuVisit ForumsOpen Sidebar
Skip to Content

EU Opens Non-Compliance Investigations into Apple, Meta, and Google

Apple's compliance with new EU laws designed to rein in the market power of big tech companies is set to be investigated by regulators, the European Commission has announced.

Apple EU iOS Changes
The Commission said on Monday that non-compliance investigations have been opened against Apple, Google, and Meta, under the new Digital Markets Act (DMA).

The probe into Apple will look at whether the company allows developers to "steer" users away from its App Store, as well as its default web browser choice screen. Google's rules on steering in Google Play and self-preferencing in Google searches are also being looked at, as is Meta's "pay or consent model."

The Commission has opened proceedings to assess whether the measures implemented by Alphabet and Apple in relation to their obligations pertaining to app stores are in breach of the DMA. Article 5(4) of the DMA requires gatekeepers to allow app developers to "steer" consumers to offers outside the gatekeepers' app stores, free of charge.

The Commission is concerned that Alphabet's and Apple's measures may not be fully compliant as they impose various restrictions and limitations. These constrain, among other things, developers' ability to freely communicate and promote offers and directly conclude contracts, including by imposing various charges.

[...]

The Commission has opened proceedings against Apple regarding their measures to comply with obligations to (i) enable end users to easily uninstall any software applications on iOS, (ii) easily change default settings on iOS and (iii) prompt users with choice screens which must effectively and easily allow them to select an alternative default service, such as a browser or search engine on their iPhones.

The Commission is concerned that Apple's measures, including the design of the web browser choice screen, may be preventing users from truly exercising their choice of services within the Apple ecosystem, in contravention of Article 6(3) of the DMA.

The Commission said it is also taking other investigatory steps to gather facts and information to clarify whether Apple's new fee structure and other terms and conditions for alternative app stores and distribution of apps from the web (sideloading) may be defeating the purpose of its obligations under the DMA.

The Commission has also adopted five retention orders addressed to Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta, and Microsoft, asking them to retain documents which might be used to assess their compliance with the DMA obligations. The Commission intends to conclude the proceedings opened today within 12 months.

In cases of infringement, the Commission can impose fines up to 10% of the company's total worldwide turnover. Such fines can go up to 20% in case of repeated infringement under the DMA. The Commission also has the power to adopt "additional remedies" such as "obliging a gatekeeper to sell a business or parts of it," or banning the company from acquisitions of additional services related to the non-compliance.

Apple earlier this month implemented several major changes to the way the ‌App Store‌ and apps operate in the EU in order to comply with the DMA. These changes are included in iOS 17.4, but are generally limited to countries that are in the European Union.

Popular Stories

Apple Objects to Keyboard Makers Logo Feature

Apple Wins EU Challenge Over Keyboard Maker's Citrus Logo

Wednesday May 6, 2026 11:48 am PDT by
Apple objected to a European trademark filing from a Chinese keyboard maker because the logo the company wanted to use was too close to Apple's own logo. The EU Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) partially refused to grant a European Union Trade Mark after Apple opposed the filing. The company, Yichun Qinningmeng Electronics Co., makes mechanical keyboards and keycaps, according to its...
Apple Logo 16x9 US Flag Feature

Apple Subpoenas Samsung in South Korea Over DOJ Antitrust Case

Thursday April 9, 2026 4:20 am PDT by
Apple has asked a U.S. court to formally request internal Samsung documents from South Korea as part of discovery in the DOJ's ongoing antitrust lawsuit against the company. The DOJ filed suit against Apple in March 2024, alongside a number of governments, alleging the company used App Store rules, developer restrictions, and control over key iPhone features to stifle competition. After Apple...
apple india

Apple Withholds Data as India Antitrust Case Advances to Final Hearing

Monday April 20, 2026 4:55 am PDT by
Apple is facing a fast-track decision on regulatory penalties in India because it has not submitted data sought by the country's antitrust body as part of an investigation into its market practices. The Competition Commission of India (CCI) ⁠published a report in 2024 that Apple exploited its dominant position in the apps market by forcing developers to use its proprietary in-app purchase...

Top Rated Comments

28 months ago

Precious engineering resources being wasted on this
Then maybe Apple should've complied in good faith.
Score: 55 Votes (Like | Disagree)
ItsASpider Avatar
28 months ago
I'm shocked. Shocked, I say.

Not really, tho. That these companies weren't actually following the rules properly was kinda clear (and yes people, the rules are perfectly clear). It's telling that Microsoft of all companies is not being investigated.
Score: 40 Votes (Like | Disagree)
28 months ago

20% of worldwide turnover as a penalty? I would say that is a good enough reason to exit that region.

Why didn't Tim Cook just start selling Android phones instead in the EU? The solution is so simple. Then it is Google their problem.
And when they're hit in China for similar reasons, they should exit that market as well? And what would happen when DOJ starts anti-trust case against Apple? Quit US market as well, and sell only to penguins in Antarctica?
Score: 29 Votes (Like | Disagree)
contacos Avatar
28 months ago

Maybe the EU should employ better lawyers to stop companies easily circumventing the new rules

I'm surprised that there isn't a fine structure set up so that malicious compliance isn't a trigger for a % of revenues-level fine.
Isn’t this the point of this investigation? Seems like those companies may simply not follow those established new rules. No need for the EU to get „better lawyers“
Score: 19 Votes (Like | Disagree)
28 months ago
Ya well whatever. The real news is the overwhelming majority growing consensus that the DoJ case against Apple is a joke.
Score: 19 Votes (Like | Disagree)
28 months ago
The drama continues, but it seemed likely that parts of Apple's proposed solution would be problematic or at least come under increased scrutiny. The fee structures are quite clearly set up to dissuade alternative app stores, as are the procedures around it.

In any case, anyone who thought that it was all done and dusted, signed off by the Commission and Apple in the clear was obviously wrong.
Score: 17 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Related Apple News: Imac Deals | Forums | Satechi Findall | Ios | Rumors